11 stories
In so-called "Industry 4.0," integrated sensors, analytics tools, and other digital technologies supplement industrial workflows, potentiating enhanced visibility and automation.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for multi-turn agentic tasks that require interactions with users and environments over extended sequences of actions.
As LLM agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes enterprise settings, understanding how they handle sensitive information in agentic dialogue has become critical.
LLM agents for clinical text-to-SQL applications reason autonomously over multiple steps but cannot assess whether their own reasoning or outputs can be trusted. In high leverage applications such as healthcare, this presents a critical risk where system mistakes can be costly.
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as autonomous agents that invoke external tools. However, this capability introduces tool hallucination, selecting incorrect tools or generating invalid calls.
Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) is increasingly used in applications where large language models (LLMs) interact with humans and other agents. Here we use social deduction games to study how RFT changes LLMs' social behaviour.
Building LLMs that behave well socially, not merely correctly, requires Building LLMs that behave well socially, not merely correctly, requires more than producing locally helpful responses.
Static evaluations credit a language model for naming the right move, but an agent must carry a plan through to a verified outcome while an opponent responds.
Multi-agent debate is increasingly used to reach consensus among LLM agents, yet agents often yield to a unanimous majority. When an agent changes its answer, has it changed its mind or only its statement? We study this with two-hop factual questions whose intermediate entity (the bridge, e.g.
Recent benchmarks rely on user simulators to evaluate AI agents in multi-turn interaction. While existing simulation techniques demonstrate surface fidelity to human style and behavior, ecologically valid interactive benchmarking also requires alignment in when and how agents fail across simulated…
When Isaac Newton discovered the law of gravitation, he did so through an iterative process of analyzing observed data such as planetary patterns, finding the underlying mechanisms by describing patterns in mathematical equations, and refining his theory against the Moon's orbit, revealing the…
Showing 11 of 11 stories
You're all caught up.
Get the top AI news and tools straight to your inbox every week.
Weekly · AI news from arXiv - cs.CL (NLP)
Join 15,000+ AI enthusiasts
