Know a great AI tool or AI news source? Submit it to AiByts
kagglechallenge3 min read

MyanmarChemCalc-Bench: Do LLMs Do Chemistry Better in English Than in Burmese?

Benchmark: https://www.kaggle.com/benchmarks/winkoaung/myanmar-chem-calc-bench What tasks did I run? MyanmarChemCalc-Bench — 30 tasks built from 15 chemistry calculation questions drawn from Myanmar's Grades 9–12 chemistry textbook worked examples (ground-truth answers verified against the…

By Win AungDev.to AI
MyanmarChemCalc-Bench: Do LLMs Do Chemistry Better in English Than in Burmese?

This article presents a benchmark called MyanmarChemCalc-Bench, which evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) in solving chemistry calculation problems in both English and Burmese. The benchmark is designed to assess whether LLMs perform better in English than in Burmese, considering the latter as a low-resource language.

What happened

The article describes a Kaggle benchmarking challenge where the performance of several large language models (LLMs) was evaluated on a set of chemistry calculation problems in both English and Burmese. The benchmark was designed to test whether LLMs perform better in English than in Burmese, a low-resource language. The results showed that the low score of one model, Qwen, was due to execution errors rather than incorrect answers. Additionally, the use of Arabic numerals in Burmese prompts improved model performance, suggesting that the issue was not with the language itself but with the formatting of the input.

Why it matters

This benchmark is significant for AI developers and NLP researchers because it highlights the challenges of multilingual support in LLMs, particularly for low-resource languages like Burmese. It also demonstrates the importance of input formatting in model performance and the need for reliable benchmarking practices to avoid misinterpretation of results.

  • The performance of LLMs in Burmese can be influenced by input formatting, such as the use of Arabic numerals.
  • Execution errors can distort benchmark results, so it is important to report passes, fails, and errors separately.
  • Small benchmarks can be misleading due to the limited number of tasks, so repeated runs and evaluations are necessary for meaningful conclusions.
  • The use of Arabic numerals in Burmese prompts improved model performance, indicating that the issue was not with the language itself but with the formatting of the input.

The bigger picture

The benchmark has practical implications for the development of multilingual NLP models, particularly for low-resource languages. It also underscores the importance of reliable benchmarking practices to ensure accurate evaluation of model performance.

The MyanmarChemCalc-Bench benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance of LLMs in solving chemistry calculation problems in both English and Burmese. The results highlight the importance of input formatting, execution reliability, and the need for careful benchmarking practices to ensure accurate evaluation of model capabilities.

Technical details

  • The benchmark includes 30 tasks derived from 15 chemistry calculation questions from Myanmar's Grades 9–12 textbooks.
  • Each question is available in both English and Burmese versions, with the same numerical values and expected answers.
  • The scoring is strict and automatic, requiring models to show their work and provide the final answer in a specific format.
  • A Python checker is used to extract the final answer and compare it against the ground truth within a per-question tolerance.
  • The use of Arabic numerals in Burmese prompts was found to improve model performance.

FAQ

What is MyanmarChemCalc-Bench?

MyanmarChemCalc-Bench is a benchmark that evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) in solving chemistry calculation problems in both English and Burmese.

Which models were tested in the benchmark?

Five models were tested: Claude Sonnet 4.5, DeepSeek-R1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-6 Astra, and Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct.

Why was the use of Arabic numerals in Burmese prompts important?

The use of Arabic numerals in Burmese prompts improved model performance, indicating that the issue was not with the language itself but with the formatting of the input.

What was the main finding of the benchmark?

The main finding was that the low score of Qwen was due to execution errors rather than incorrect answers, highlighting the importance of reliable benchmarking practices.

What are the implications of this benchmark for AI developers?

This benchmark highlights the challenges of multilingual support in LLMs, particularly for low-resource languages like Burmese, and underscores the importance of input formatting and reliable benchmarking practices.

This summary and analysis were generated with AI from the original article and may contain errors. Read the original for the full story.

Read the full story

Originally published by Dev.to AI on Oct 3, 2026.

Read on Dev.to AI(opens in a new tab)

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts.