Disagree and Commit
Disagree and commit is a promise to back a decision you argued against. It works only when the disagreement is kept somewhere, so the team knows what it bet against and when to look again.
31 stories
Disagree and commit is a promise to back a decision you argued against. It works only when the disagreement is kept somewhere, so the team knows what it bet against and when to look again.
When a decision starts failing, the person who made it tends to invest more. What helps is changing what admitting the miss costs, before anyone has to.
A good outcome doesn't prove a good decision, and a bad one doesn't prove a bad decision. Grading calls by results alone teaches teams to abandon what works and repeat what got lucky.
A risk is easy to acknowledge and easy to ignore. A tripwire decides in advance which evidence will force the plan to react.
The plan passed review. Six weeks later, it failed. A premortem asks what most likely went wrong before execution begins.
A detailed plan explains why this project should work. The outside view asks what happened the last several times your team tried something similar.
An agent that stops too early wastes a run. An agent that was never told where to stop can spend a promise someone else made.
A small action can carry a large blast radius when customers, workflows, or dependent decisions inherit its effects.
A decision can be reversible for the company and costly for everyone who acted on it. The real question is who pays when it is undone.
Most decisions are two-way doors, and agents are right to walk through them fast. The trouble is the few that aren't, and the fact that reversibility depends on more than the decision itself.
Learn how to evaluate, hire, and manage a product development agency. Covers pricing, RFP questions, team structures, and post-launch SEO strategies.
The worst automated system isn't one that misses problems. It's one that flags so many non-problems that you stop listening.
The worst output from an automated system isn't a wrong answer. It's a confident wrong answer that looks right.
Every point of confidence gained is a cost paid somewhere: slower response, more tokens burned, longer deliberation. The question isn't whether to pay it. It's when.
Signing off on something you didn't look at is not approval. It's permission to do whatever you were going to do anyway.
Trusting a scheduled agent by watching what it does over time means it was already doing that unsupervised the whole time you were watching. Something has to check its work before the first run, not after enough of them.
A new ticket can mention the same decision, the same system, the same words as an old commitment, whether it's carrying that decision out or reversing it. Similarity alone can't tell you which.
Teams track tasks long after they stop tracking the assumptions behind them. That is how old decisions become decision debt.
Showing 18 of 31 stories
Load more storiesGet the top AI news and tools straight to your inbox every week.
Weekly · AI news
Join 15,000+ AI enthusiasts